“NLP Status Report 2017-6-5”版本间的差异
来自cslt Wiki
(相同用户的2个中间修订版本未显示) | |||
第23行: | 第23行: | ||
* trained word2vec on big data, and directly used it on NMT, but resulted in quite poor performance | * trained word2vec on big data, and directly used it on NMT, but resulted in quite poor performance | ||
* trained M-NMT model, got bleu=36.58 (+1.34 than NMT). But found the EOS in mem has a big influence on result: | * trained M-NMT model, got bleu=36.58 (+1.34 than NMT). But found the EOS in mem has a big influence on result: | ||
− | + | {| class="wikitable" | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! NMT | ||
+ | ! 35.24, 57.7/39.8/31.9/27.0 BP=0.939 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |MNMT (EOS=1) | ||
+ | | 35.27, 60.0/41.3/33.1/28.0 BP=0.907 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | MNMT (EOS=0.2) | ||
+ | | 36.40, 59.1/40.8/32.6/27.4 BP=0.951 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | MNMT (EOS=0) | ||
+ | | 36.58, 58.4/40.4/32.1/27.0 BP=0.968 | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | * tried to tackle UNK using 36.58 M-NMT, increased vocab to 50000, got bleu=35.63, 58.6/40.0/31.6/26.4 BP=0.953 (not good, ?) | ||
+ | * training uy-zh, 50% zh-uy, 25% zh-uy | ||
+ | * training mem without EOS | ||
+ | * reviewing related papers | ||
|| | || | ||
− | + | * solve EOS problem | |
+ | * find way to tackle UNK | ||
+ | * write paper | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Shipan Ren || | |Shipan Ren || |
2017年6月5日 (一) 06:04的最后版本
Date | People | Last Week | This Week | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017/6/5 | Jiyuan Zhang | |||||||||
Aodong LI |
Only make the English encoder's embedding constant -- 45.98 Only initialize the English encoder's embedding and then finetune it -- 46.06 Share the attention mechanism and then directly add them -- 46.20
Shrink output vocab from 30000 to 20000 and best result is 31.53 Train the model with 40 batch size and best result until now is 30.63 |
| ||||||||
Shiyue Zhang |
|
| ||||||||
Shipan Ren |